Customized Communion

WASHINGTON – Communion has been the subject of some recent high-profile debates, ranging from calls to deny the sacrament to then Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry to a decision to revoke the first Communion of an 8-year-old girl Roman Catholic girl because she ingested a non-wheat wafer.

The reality is that the meaning of Communion and the way it is practiced have been sources of dispute since the early centuries of Christianity. Those debates continue but rarely reach the national stage because they involve often-subtle changes made by church hierarchies or conflicts within individual congregations.

Yet such discussions are important because they go to the heart of the Christian faith, say clergy and denominational officials. They affect the way believers perceive and take part in one of the most sacred events in Christian history: the meal Jesus shared with his disciples the night before his crucifixion. And they affect efforts to foster unity among Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox Christians and end theological and liturgical disputes that have created deep divisions in Christianity.

For those with a goal of unity, success could be far in the future, with Communion practices becoming more diverse as congregations search for new ways to accommodate the lifestyles and sensibilities of their members.

Juleen Turnage, spokeswoman for the Assemblies of God, said some megachurches in her denomination – including her own 6,000-member church – have found it unwieldy to offer Communion during packed Sunday morning services and now do so only during the lesser-attended Sunday night services.

“It’s a matter of practicality,” she said.

John Revell, spokesman for the Southern Baptist Convention, said many churches now use Communion kits, which consist of a wafer and a small plastic cup of grape juice. The prepackaged kits, which are passed through the pews on cardboard instead of silver trays, make breaking up crackers and filling hundreds of tiny glasses – and washing them afterward – a thing of the past.

The United Methodist Church passed a resolution at its general conference in May urging congregations to shed generations of tradition by offering Communion weekly rather than monthly. The effort is to “reshape the focus on Communion by urging people to celebrate the Eucharist more often,” said denomination spokesman Stephen Drachler.

Moving toward weekly Communion also has been a goal of many Lutherans for more than 30 years, said the Rev. Michael Burk, director of worship for the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. One reason was the adoption of a book of worship in 1978 that placed more emphasis on Communion; another is the church’s use of a common lectionary developed in recent years by Roman Catholic and mainline Protestant leaders, he said.

And the Presbyterian Church (USA) has been moving slowly from monthly to weekly Communion, said the Rev. Joseph Small, director of the church’s office of theology and worship. Small said he knows of at least 400 Presbyterian churches, out of about 8,000, that offer Communion weekly.

A more evident change among Presbyterians, whose Reformation forebears rejected many Catholic Communion practices, has been an increase in the number of congregations that prefer taking Communion at the altar rail rather than in the pews, Small said. Many now use wine instead of grape juice and prefer the method of intinction, in which a piece of bread is dipped into a common chalice, then consumed.

One thing that hasn’t changed for most Protestants is their rejection of transubstantiation, the Catholic teaching that the elements – bread and wine – are transformed during the Eucharist into the body and blood of Jesus and remain so. In the Roman Catholic Church, any leftover wine must be consumed by the priest, and the leftover hosts or wafers must be kept in a receptacle known as a tabernacle.

Burk said Evangelical Lutherans believe that the bread and wine are transformed into the body and blood of Jesus, but only for that meal. Any leftovers are “bread that was used in Holy Communion,” not thebody and blood of Jesus, he said.

But most Protestants view the bread and wine as a symbol of Jesus’ presence, placing less emphasis on the elements’ physical makeup and more on the communal sharing of bread and wine (or grape juice). For some, monthly Communion isn’t merely adequate but preferred. The Rev. Ronald Braxton, pastor of Metropolitan AME Church in Washington, said that African Methodist Episcopalians believe that Communion is a “renewal of our relationship with the Savior,” not a “physical taking of Christ into our body.”

“The way we live our lives, the way we execute our faith every day is our participation in Christ,” he said. That means daily prayer, meditation, Bible study and weekly worship with other believers. Taking Communion is important, but once a month is sufficient, he said.

Braxton’s denomination was drawn into the fray over Kerry’s Communion practices when the nominee took Communion on Palm Sunday at Charles Street AME Church in Boston. Some Catholic leaders and pundits criticized Kerry, a Roman Catholic, for taking part in a Protestant ritual.

Monsignor James Moroney, executive director of office of liturgy for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said the church generally does not condone the participation of Catholics in non-Catholic Communion, but he said it’s a matter of degree of theological difference and a decision to be made by the local bishop.

“If a Catholic goes to an Orthodox Church and receives Holy Communion, are we concerned with that? No,” Moroney said. “If he went to a Baptist church, that would be considered inappropriate.”

The greater outcry involving Kerry concerned several Catholic bishops’ statements in the spring that they would not offer Communion to Kerry because he supports a woman’s right to abortion. A majority of American Catholics support abortion rights, and many were outraged at the suggestion that Kerry was guilty of a “serious sin” – the primary reason for a priest refusing to give Communion. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement that the decision to refuse Communion was the prerogative of each bishop, not a matter of national policy.

A few months ago, some Catholics were upset that the bishop of the Diocese of Trenton in New Jersey declared invalid the first Communion of Elizabeth Pelly-Waldman. The 8-year-old has celiac sprue disease, a digestive disorder that prevented her from consuming the wheat wafers required by the church. Her priest gave her a rice wafer, and the bishop revoked the Communion.

Moroney said the church does insist on the use of unleavened wafers but understands that thousands of Catholics suffer from celiac sprue disease. It offers alternatives, including a recently developed wafer that is 0.01 percent wheat and the use of only wine in Holy Communion.

Although both elements must be consecrated and consumed by the priest during Mass, the taking of one element – bread or wine – is sufficient for lay communicants, he said. Moroney said reuniting disparate branches of Christianity would be impossible without a common doctrine of Communion.

November 13, 2004; BY THE WASHINGTON POST; Thanks to FWD from Fr Peter Alban Heers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

OPINION: From the Holy Land

The following is from Dr Maria Khoury:

Dearly Beloved in Christ our Savior,

I send you many greetings from our small village of Taybeh in the middle of Biblical Judea where we as Christian people are still trying to survive and exist and in non violent ways resisting the agenda and the Israeli Occupation to create a hundred percent Jewish homeland in historic Palestine by choking us up with hundreds of illegal Israeli settlements.

In the last five years nothing has changed in our lives being literally prisoners in an open area. The unemployment is still over 50% because if organizations do not bring projects into our area there is simply no work for the local people. The Latin Church is very active in creating jobs. I see the Orthodox Christian presence constantly diminishing.

We are waiting moment by moment to see the news of the Palestinian president Yasser Arafat and what that means for all of us on the ground. As much as Mr. Arafat might be corrupt or a questionable leader, I cannot help but personally respect him for the many years of steadfast resistance and efforts to bring liberty to the Palestinian people. For me he is the lesser of all evil that exists in Palestine. I can only pray for a moderate democratic government when he is gone. He fought when he had to fight, he negotiated when he had to make peace and he stayed steadfast in the struggle when he was captured. People here love him and he was the legitimately elected Palestinian president who was a symbol of the Palestinian struggle. He is literally a local icon. I feel sad that he will not die in his beloved homeland.

As a Christian person, I always felt safe and great comfort in knowing and seeing that Arafat’s closest advisors were also Christian and well trusted by him. Mr. Nabil Abuderneih who often is the spokesman for Arafat has been on his side at most critical times during the last four years along with Mr. Ramzi Khoury, both are Christian.

Before the Israelis confined Arafat to his Ramallah compound he always showed up at the Orthodox Christmas celebration in Bethlehem as well as the Western Christmas celebration. This attendance alone gave me great hope that as the mother of Palestinian Christian children, they would have a future living as Christians in the Holy Land. Since our Christian community is small, we are very concerned about maintaining our witness for Christ in such a precious and sacred land made holy by Christ himself.

Although Arafat’s wife is very young and such a marriage between a Muslim and a Christian is strictly forbidden in the culture and accepted only among royalty, this fact also that Ms. Suha Taweel Arafat was born an Orthodox Christian gave us great hope that Arafat’s government and policies were inclusive of Christians and Muslims in creating a free Palestine. We felt we had a place with Arafat…

The Heads of all Christian Churches in Jerusalem met at the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate and made a public statement yesterday upholding President Arafat in their prayers together with the Palestinian leadership and Palestinian people. They expressed the hope that a fence of unity and common purpose be maintained at this critical time by all the Palestinians (Christians and Muslims) and that the peace process continues.

Please keep us in your prayers too for we have so many days of unknowing ahead. May our Lord have mercy in the land of His Holy Resurrection!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dicey? Did You Say Dicey?

Here’s a story about Planned Parenthood teaching MANDATORY sex ed classes in a Florida school system. (The article actually uses the word “dicey” — which, when you think about it, strikes a morbid pun within a PP context.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Asinine in Asheville

We seem to have lost sight of the fact that we are supposed to have a separation between church and state in this country. There are large numbers of people in the U.S. who just voted for President Bush as a result of his perceived Christian values. The only problem is that our forefathers had the foresight to see that this was a country founded on diversity and that religion had no place in government. Therefore, those who voted for Bush because of his religious ideology, should consider moving to another country where they don’t have our pesky Constitution to get in the way of their ruler legislating morality based on his personal faith. In short, it’s un-American to want a president (or any elected official) who is pushing a particular religious agenda, even if it is an agenda with which you agree. This nation’s founders had the foresight to realize that people of different faiths needed to be respected, but our current administration and half the voters seem to have forgotten this crucial fact. I respect all faiths and believe in God, but keep you faith our of U.S. politics or find somewhere else to live.

The above entry appeared in yesterday’s Letters to the Editor section of the Asheville Citizen-Times newspaper.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Transphobia?

I don’t pretend to speak for the entire transphobic community, but my own strong belief is that transphobia is not a matter of choice. I was born this way, and there is nothing “wrong” with it. We are all children of God, and labels don’t mean anything anyway. I very deeply respect Diane’s belief that he is a woman, which is his constitutional right as an American, but when he tries to legislate that belief on others by having the government legally certify him as a woman, I draw the line. That judgment must be left to each of us.

— Joe Sobran

Props to GetReligion commments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment