Bad, Good & Weird: Happy Birthday

Arrested last September when security police raided a church conference he was attending, the Assemblies of God lay pastor faces charges of apostasy from Islam and of proselytizing Muslims. Both “crimes” are punishable by death.

Here’s the story.

From the Touchstone folks, three blogs worth a look.

Michael Jackson. I liked him when he was little, just a little older than me. But since then, I’ve always thought he was weird. He wanted us to think that. Well, you know what? I don’t know how to break this to you but, Michael Jackson is weird. Even weirder are the women — MOTHERS — who’ve let their young children sleep in his bed. Anyway, what she said.

Perhaps Michael Jackson should take up wrestling. Can you see that? What? You don’t want him on the mat with your son? How ’bout your daughter? Just don’t let the girl win Michael!

Gonna go see The Kingdom of Heaven, the new movie about the Crusades? Dawn knows, and seems fairly unimpressed with, the writer. Here’s why.

Steve Beard of Thunderstruck, it seems fair to say, enjoyed himself.

And …

This week, this BLOG turns One.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Da Vinci Code (Pt 6)

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5

“Nothing in Christianity is original. The pre-Christian God Mithras — called the Son of God and the Light of the World — was born on December 25, died, was buried in a rock tomb, and then resurrected in three days. By the way, December 25 is also the birthday of Osiris, Adonis and Dionysus. The newborn Krishna was presented with gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Even Christianity’s weekly holy day was stolen from the pagans” (p.232).

First of all, are you ready for this? Please, if you have any interest at all in Brown’s Mithras claim, make time and go H E R E. This is an excellent explanation of the Mithratic cult. Makes perfect sense to me. A most worthy READ — “The Cosmic Mysteries of Mithras”, by David Ulansey, which came to me via Huw Raphael.

Secondly, any Catholic school girl knows that December 25th is not commemorated as Jesus’s “Birthday”. Here Brown sounds like a back-woods anti-Catholic hick. For a very interesting & different history of the Feast of the Nativity, go HERE.

As to the Mithraism & Krishna references, Brown seems to have gotten his “info” from a notorious 19th century source, The World’s Sixteen Crucified Saviors or Christianity Before Christ. This book, by Kersey Graves, is “a work of pseudo-scholarship and anti-Christian polemics that is so shoddy that even atheists and agnostics disavow it” (Envoy).

Graves conveniently provides no sources or citations, which is one of many reasons his book has been long discredited by scholars working in the field of comparative religion. But that doesn’t keep this popular idea from appearing on numerous websites–none providing sources or citations (and rarely mentioning Graves’ book). There’s good reason for this absence of evidence. The Bhagavad-Gita (first century A.D.) doesn’t mention Krishna’s childhood, and the stories of Krishna’s childhood recorded in the Harivamsa Purana (c. 300 A.D.) and the Bhagavata Purana (c. 800-900 A.D.) don’t mention the gifts at all. Even if they did, those works were written well after the birth of Christ, making such a claim absurd” (Envoy).

“Originally … Christianity honored the Jewish Sabbath of Saturday, but Constantine shifted it to coincide with the pagan’s veneration day of the sun.” He paused, grinning. “To this day, most churchgoers attend services on Sunday morning with no idea that they are there on account of the pagan sun god’s weekly tribute — Sunday” (p.233).

Ever since the day of the Lord’s Resurrection, those who believed Him to be the Messiah, the Christ, have kept the day of His rising — Sunday — as holy.

“Brown apparently thinks that since the observance of Sunday as a day of rest wasn’t sanctioned by civil authorities until the fourth century than it must not been observed prior to that time. But over one hundred years earlier, around 200, Tertullian writes about Sunday as a day of rest: “We, however (just as tradition has taught us), on the day of the Lord’s Resurrection ought to guard not only against kneeling, but every posture and office of solicitude, deferring even our businesses lest we give any place to the devil” (De orat., xxiii; cf. Ad nation., I, xiii; Apolog., xvi). The Council of Elvira, a local Spanish council that convened around 303, decreed that Sunday was to be a special day of worship and rest, stating, “If anyone in the city neglects to come to church for three Sundays, let him be excommunicated for a short time so that he may be corrected” (Canon xxi). Two decades later, in 321., Constantine officially declared Sunday a day of rest in the Roman Empire, “commanding abstention from work, including legal business, for townspeople, though permitting farm labour” (Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 1558). Since Christians considered Jesus to be the “Sun of Righteousness” (Mal 4:2) spoken of in the Old Testament and “the light of the world” (Jn 812; 9:5) in the New Testament, they thought it fitting that the true God would supercede the old Roman Sun-god. St Jerome (c. 345-420) wrote, “The Lord’s day, the day of Resurrection, the day of Christians, is our day. It is called the Lord’s day because on it the Lord rose victorious to the Father. If pagans call it the ‘day of the sun,’ we willingly agree, for today the light of the world is raised, today is revealed the sun of justice with healing in his rays” [St. Jerome, Pasch.: CCL 78, 550. Quoted in Catechism of the Catholic Church, par. 1166]” (Envoy)

Next time, we head back to the Council of Nicea — where, according to Dan Brown, Jesus was VOTED IN as Son of God …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pascha in the West and the East

by His Eminence, Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos

[I’ve read his books, admire his work, met him, and consider myself a “fan”. But I honestly have no idea what His Eminence is trying to say in this article. Perhaps something got lost in translation?]

The Orthodox Church is the Church of the Resurrection, because it gives prominence to Christ’s victory over death. Pascha is the overcoming of death, the passage of the Word to the human nous and not the diffusion of the nous to human reason and senses.

When one examines the “ethos” of the Orthodox, one finds that it sheds the “spirit” and the life that comes out of the Tomb: the “life in the tomb” as the hymns say. It is a blaze and orgasm of life. This is where the difference between western Christianity and the Orthodox Church can be seen:

*Saint Francis, in Kanzantzakis’ biography, reaching the highest degree of spiritual life by feeling “God crucified” in his body. He said, “It’s a cross, Brother Leone, man’s body is a cross — open your arms and you will see — God is crucified upon it”. And he prayed, “My Christ, my love, I ask one favour of you, one favour for me before I die — that I may feel in my body and soul, as far as possible, Your pain and Your Holy passion…” He reached the point of seeing the wounds of the Cross on his body, and while he asked for another, greater, experience, he heard a divine voice saying: “Do not ask for more; this is where man’s ascent ends at the Crucifixion!”

*On the other hand, an Orthodox saint, St. Silouan the Athonite, saw the Resurrected Christ and experienced Pascha within his being and within creation. Following the vision of Christ resurrected he said, “I was living in a paschal feast. Everything was beautiful; the world was grand, people were pleasing, nature was unspeakably lovely, the body changed and became light, strength was added … the soul overflowed with joy, it had compassion on people and prayed for the whole world.”

This difference between Western and Eastern thinking is seen in the difference between Sartre and St. Serpahim of Sarov. The former (Sartre) disillusioned by western Christianity said “The other is my hell!”. The latter (saint Seraphim of Sarov) addressed everyone who met him with the greeting “Christ is Risen, my joy”. Each and every ‘other’ is not ‘different’ a ‘stranger’ a ‘foreigner’ , but a brother. The experience of the Resurrection overcomes death, neutralizes selfishness, abolishes Hades. Otherwise, man is enclosed in his own personal hell.

Mortal problems

In celebrating “our Pascha” as “the feast of feasts” and as “the death of death, the first-fruits of another life that is eternal” we feel within ourselves and around ourselves the scent of spiritual death, of life that is before the Resurrection of Christ.

We live biological life simply as survival, and indeed, mortal. We chant “Christ is Risen!”, we celebrate on the outside, but the bitterness of Hades rules within us, often even in church life. The remembrance of death is bitter, so too the pain of loneliness. The venomous constraints in the field of Christianity are bitter, even in the Church itself, which continues to be the Church of the Resurrection and to preach the mystery of the Resurrection.

Our various passions keep us away from the existential festival of life. The various pressures make church life feel different. Christians divided by various political considerations, the Orthodox with various rivalries amongst themselves, does not remind us of the Resurrected Christ at all.

The crucifixion of the Orthodox Church continues. The wounds of the Cross of the Church in Jerusalem, from internal weaknesses and external influences blacken the “Holy Fire” that comes from the Sepulchre of Christ. The political opportunism, the nationalistic racists with all too human passions do not allow the joy of the Resurrection to shine out as light to the people around.

The domineering powers that can be seen in all Christian confessions drain away the “Joy to all”, the “Peace unto you”, the “be of good cheer”, because they are ruled by other alien powers, foreign to the “spirit” of the Resurrected Christ. Unfortunately, politics, often in ecclesiastical dress, are the nails of the crucified Church, the bride of the Resurrected Christ. And the worldly-led pressures take place in the name of the term “mother Church”.

In accordance with the decisions of the Ecumenical Synods and the later secession of the Papal Church from the truth of Orthodoxy, the Ecumenical Patriarchate is the First Throne – mother Church. However, some Orthodox Churches are trying to raise up the Church of Jerusalem into this place and they call her mother Church, at the expense of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Even the new Pope, as President of the Committee for the teaching of the Faith, which is an continuation of the Inquisition, a few years ago (2000), published a text which examined the term “sister Churches”, which had been used both by Patriarch Athenagoras as well as by the Second Vatican Council. He explained that “The holy, catholic and apostolic universal Church (meaning the Roman Catholic) is not a sister, but the mother of all the particular churches.” So he recommends that “One should avoid, as a cause of misunderstanding and theological confusion, the use of terms such as “our two Churches…” The Ecumenical Patriarchate is thus undermined and a worldly expression of
the Church can be seen.

The True Pascha of the Church

Our Pascha, as the victory over death and the experience of life, is lived out today despite the secular-minded powers and tendencies. It is experienced by those who live humbly and existentially within the sphere of the Church, away from secularization, racism and political considerations and can be clearly seen in the relics of saints. Normally, the bodies of those saints that have fallen asleep, which are a just mass of cells, within which are included the cells for ageing, should rot away. However, the power and grace of the Resurrection does not let them break up, something which proves they have overcome death. The saint is a person who is asleep awaiting the last wake up call. This is our Pascha, as a mystery of the Resurrection, and not as a religiousized Christianity with the passion of love of precendence, of division, of rivalry. ‘Our Pascha’ cannot be replaced by ‘our Religion’, which lives under the rule of death. Resurrected Christ cannot be made up of political expressions of Christianity, and the power of the Resurrection cannot fit within “Christian States”. It is experienced apophatically, hesychastically, with eros, and humility.

Translated from: http://www.enet.gr/online/online_text?c=110&id;=34938448.
Originally posted on the Orthodox (Indiana) List by Marina Robb.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Darwin’s Extinction?

Nearly 30 years of teaching evolution in Kansas has taught Brad Williamson to expect resistance, but even this veteran of the trenches now has his work cut out for him when students raise their hands.

That’s because critics of Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection are equipping families with books, DVDs, and a list of “10 questions to ask your biology teacher.”

What some students are asking their biology teachers

Critics of evolution are supplying students with prepared questions on such topics as:

• The origins of life. Why do textbooks claim that the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment shows how life’s building blocks may have formed on Earth – when conditions on the early Earth were probably nothing like those used in the experiment, and the origin of life remains a mystery?

• Darwin’s tree of life. Why don’t textbooks discuss the “Cambrian explosion,” in which all major animal groups appear together in the fossil record fully formed instead of branching from a common ancestor – thus contradicting the evolutionary tree of life?

• Vertebrate embryos. Why do textbooks use drawings of similarities in vertebrate embryos as evidence for common ancestry – even though biologists have known for over a century that vertebrate embryos are not most similar in their early stages, and the drawings are faked?

• The archaeopteryx. Why do textbooks portray this fossil as the missing link between dinosaurs and modern birds – even though modern birds are probably not descended from it, and its supposed ancestors do not appear until millions of years after it?

• Peppered moths. Why do textbooks use pictures of peppered moths camouflaged on tree trunks as evidence for natural selection – when biologists have known since the 1980s that the moths don’t normally rest on tree trunks, and all the pictures have been staged?

• Darwin’s finches. Why do textbooks claim that beak changes in Galapagos finches during a severe drought can explain the origin of species by natural selection – even though the changes were reversed after the drought ended, and no net evolution occurred?

• Mutant fruit flies. Why do textbooks use fruit flies with an extra pair of wings as evidence that DNA mutations can supply raw materials for evolution – even though the extra wings have no muscles and these disabled mutants cannot survive outside the laboratory?

• Human origins. Why are artists’ drawings of apelike humans used to justify materialistic claims that we are just animals and our existence is a mere accident – when fossil experts cannot even agree on who our supposed ancestors were or what they looked like?

• Evolution as a fact. Why are students told that Darwin’s theory of evolution is a scientific fact – even though many of its claims are based on misrepresentations of the facts?

Source: Discovery Institute

Read the entire article at Christian Science Monitor.
THX: Thunderstruck

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

That’s My Girl! (and boy & girl)

Okay, so she’ll kill me for posting this pic. But this is my favorite oldest daughter, Mary Catherine. I told my wife, “Ya know, having posted pics of Basil and Helen recently, it’s only a matter of time before Mary Catherine says something.”

She agreed. And boy did she ever say something …

Last night, at a PTO meeting where I was not, the 5th Graders had to stand up to the mike and state what they were going to be when they grew up. My wife, who was there, said that most kids spoke of high-paying or glamorous jobs — doctor, pro-basketball player, etc. Mary Catherine said she wanted to be a writer. She said her Dad liked to read and write and he’s an inspiration to her.

Gulp.

Now, do you see why she’s my favorite oldest daughter?

Last one, I promise.
The Huneycutt kids at Pascha:

Christ is Risen!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment